Strengthscope® is the world’s most complete and innovative strengths profiling system that helps energize peak performance at work. Underpinned by 10 years of testing and research, Strengthscope® will help you to energize peak performance by releasing the power of employees’ strengths.
Strengthscope® is designed to be the first step in helping you optimize your strengths to improve your performance and engagement at work. When used as part of a strengths-based development program, the profiler and supporting tools and resources can significantly improve your performance, motivation and confidence, during good times and in the face of pressure.
The Strengthscope® profile report provides information on:
The Strengthscope® system includes a series of modules, making it the world’s most extensive strengths profiling system. These include:
Strengthscope® was designed by a team from Strengths Partnership Ltd. Strengths Partnership was founded and is jointly led by James Brook and Dr Paul Brewerton. James is an expert in innovative assessment methods, talent management and leadership development and has worked internationally in corporate and consulting roles with a wide variety of clients. Paul is an expert in organisation development, organisational culture change and psychometric design and has been running consulting businesses for 15 years. As well as Paul and James, the design team contained a range of experts in assessment, selection, management and leadership development and psychometrics.
We define strengths as ‘underlying qualities that energize you and that you are great at or have the potential to become great at’. Strengths reflect our passions and values and enable us to perform at our peak, in both good times and during tough, challenging times.
In designing the central Strengthscope® model, the design team at Strengths Partnership drew on a wide range of research produced in the fields of personality, ability, positive psychology and strengths. We drilled down to identify the essence of strengths at work; finally selecting 24 strengths which we felt best captured performance-critical strengths in the workplace.
These strengths are broken down into four ‘clusters’ of strengths, as follows:
The graph uses a standardized scale ranging from 0-10. This is technically known as a ‘sten’ (standard ten) scale and is commonly used in psychometric testing, as an easily understandable way of charting a respondent’s scores in different areas. These numbers in themselves have no meaning (e.g. reporting a 10 on the scale doesn’t mean you have scored 10 out of 10, or 100%). The scale is simply used to show your relative position compared to others in the working population. The most important thing to focus on is the position of your strengths relative to each other in your profile.
Responses to the questionnaire are compared with other people’s responses in order for a rating to be produced. In some cases, this leads to a profile having generally high scores or generally low scores. Either way, it is the pattern of scores that is most important, from highest to lowest, rather than the average scores in someone’s profile.
While some strengths are more closely associated with others, the overall chances of reporting a similar profile to other people is very small. In fact, the chances of reporting the same Top 3 strengths in the same order is 1 in 12,000 and the chances of reporting the same Top 7 strengths in the same order is 1 in 1.7 billion. People often underestimate how unique their strengths profile is – your strengths profile can indicate where you are best able to make a unique contribution at work in areas which energize you.
No, Strengthscope® is not a measure of competence, but a measure of strength, i.e. those things that energize us and make us feel positive and confident. It could be that a lower score, or non-strength, indicates something that provides little to ‘energize’ us, or it could be that a non-strength is something that is actually weakening for us if we do too much of it. It is also possible (although less likely) that one or more of the “Significant Seven” strengths are not areas in which the person is particular competent or proficient, as they don’t have the skills, knowledge and/or experience to fully apply the strength. This is less likely because many people gain feelings of strength and energy from doing something well.
Not necessarily, although a relatively high score on a strength is likely to indicate potential to perform well in this area. However, some people may never optimize their strengths, usually as a result of a lack of awareness about their strengths or because they don’t invest sufficient time and effort in maximizing it.
Seven is a bit of a “magic number” in that it has been identified as the approximate number of items that people can typically retain in their short-term memory, which contributed to our decision to focus your attention on the 7 strengths that you have rated most strongly. This enables you to work on what is important to your success and what really energizes you, rather than trying to focus on too many areas or be good at everything. However, we encourage people to identify their Standout 3 strengths as priority areas for developing their strengths.
No, there is no significance to the sequence of the “Significant 7” in the report, which is presented in alphabetical order rather than in order of the associated numerical score. We would also caution against drawing general conclusions that a “Significant 7” strength with a score slightly higher on the scale than another is more important, as some of these differences are too small to draw meaningful conclusions from. It is far more important to treat each of the “Significant 7” strengths as areas of potential strength and to explore these in relation to your current and future goals and responsibilities.
The report presents “Significant 7” strengths for each respondent; however, for some respondents, there may be other strengths that are very close in score to the “Significant 7”, what we call ‘bubbling under’ strengths – it is sometimes worth exploring whether these too are important. For other respondents, it can be that say 3 or 4 strengths really stand out in their profile, while the others appear less important.
Yes. Strengthscope® offers multi-rater feedback on your strengths as standard. It is important that you are aware of how others who are close to you view your strengths in order to determine whether they see your strengths demonstrated through your behaviours in the same way as you view yourself. What is especially important to focus on is any ‘gaps’ or ‘blind spots’ between how you view yourself and how others see you. This will generate additional insights and self-awareness, enabling you to express yourself more authentically and to build higher quality relationships based on trust and openness. We would encourage you to get additional feedback on your strengths from others who know you well (manager, co-workers, spouse or partner, friends, etc.) to confirm whether these are indeed distinctive strengths.
Yes, this is possible, but doesn’t occur very often. This is because we tend to be drawn to tasks and work that energizes and strengthens us and avoid tasks and activities that we find draining or weakening. Over time, this process of making choices (conscious and unconscious) based on the level of interest and motivation we have for a task or activity develops our knowledge, skills and experience in that area, in other words, our strengths become more visible and powerful through additional acquisition of knowledge, skills and experience. However, it is possible to be skilled or talented in an area without you finding the task or activity energizing. This tension will ultimately result in personal dissatisfaction and demotivation with that aspect of the work, even though the person may be good at it.
The first question you need to ask is “What is the impact of this non-strength/weaker area on my work?” If there is little or no impact on your current work or future aspirations then you probably shouldn’t invest too much time trying to develop in this area. However, if there is a negative impact on your performance or potential as result of this area, or if there is the risk of such impact, you should consider ways to make your non-strength/weaker area less relevant by mitigating or managing it. Possible approaches include:
No, since ‘management’ roles tend to vary significantly from organisation to organisation, there is no one set of strengths that make up a ‘good manager’. Also, research has found that similar managers call on vastly different strengths to undertake their role, with equally impactful outcomes. What is important to the success of a manager is knowing one’s strengths and applying these as optimally as possible, whilst managing or minimizing weaknesses to make them less relevant.
We believe that strengths have infinite development opportunity provided this is the right type of development. This is one of the things that makes them so powerful. However, a person could overuse a strength or use it in the wrong situation. For example, a collaborative person may seek others’ input to a decision even when an urgent response is called for. Similarly, someone who is particularly focused on getting tasks completed may forget about the people and relationship aspects of work. The Strengths Partnership has developed a card deck around ‘strengths in overdrive’ which can be purchased through the website. ‘Strengths in overdrive’ information is also contained as standard in each report.
Research has shown that an individual’s strengths tend to be fairly stable over time, as they are a core part of who we are as individuals. However, important life events (marriage, divorce, major job change, childbirth, etc.) may bring strengths into the foreground or push them into the background for a period of time.
Yes, though these factors are unlikely to distort the results significantly, as there are multiple questions measuring all 24 strengths. However, if you were influenced by a major situational factor and have reason to believe that the results are distorted as a result, it make be worth considering re-taking the questionnaire.
Strengthscope® identifies the things that ‘strengthen’ you – this is a critical distinction between Strengthscope® and a general personality measure such as OPQ or Insights for example. Strengthscope® does not describe behavioural preference (as personality questionnaires do) but instead identifies the behaviours and activities which make us feel strong, powerful and energized.
Strengthscope® differs in several important ways from other strengths assessments:
Strengths Partnership has conducted research to show the relationships between the Strengthscope® model and other models of behaviour and thinking, such as the ‘Big 5’ personality factors and the Myers Briggs model. This paper is available on request.
Competencies are typically defined as characteristics and behaviours that predict successful organisational outcomes. Most organisations using competencies have focused their efforts on defining skills, knowledge and behaviours associated with success in a particular role, function or at a particular level in the organisation (e.g. leadership). Unlike competencies, strengths are related to the person and not the role, function or level. They have a strong emotional element as well as leading to valued outcomes; the best signpost of a strength is when something energizes or strengthens you. Strengths are also part of your character – things that are core to you and are fairly consistently expressed across situations. Unlike surface characteristics such as skills and knowledge, they are relatively ‘hardwired’ in our teens and are difficult to develop and fundamentally change beyond this point.
Strengths Partnership see strengths and competencies as relating to each other as shown in the diagram below. We believe it is at the point at which skills and knowledge (competencies) and energizers or strengths, overlap, that productive habits can be developed which lead to sustainable peak performance.
Our aspiration is for Strengthscope® to be best in class in terms of psychometric properties. Our validation work with the tool is ongoing but up to now, we have obtained internal consistency and test-retest reliability ratings which far exceed the baseline required by the British Psychological Society and American Psychological Association. Median reliability currently stands at 0.83. Construct validity figures are also very positive, with clear statistical independence reported between each of Strengthscope®’s 24 strengths.
Strengthscope® profiles remain stable over time, so there is no specific requirement to re-complete. However, in cases where someone has experienced a lot of change and hasn’t completed Strengthscope for 3+years, we recommend re-doing it.
Additionally, if the person completed Strengthscope® before June 2010, we recommend that they re-complete it as the Strengthscope® module and report has been updated since that time.
Yes, accreditation training runs throughout each year and training takes one day. Experience has shown us that it is very important that prospective users of the instrument have the opportunity to watch demonstrations, use Strengthscope® in a live setting, and receive feedback on their approach. This is because the approach and emphasis in using Strengthscope® is different to more standard assessment tools.
The Accreditation Training includes:
At present, Strengthscope® can be purchased by contacting The Strengths Partnership to agree the number of uses required. Once payment is received, individual IDs or a project ID will be allocated to you. You then invite participants to complete the questionnaire at www.strengthscope.com. We monitor completion rates and remain on hand for any support required. You can decide whether feedback reports should be sent to you or direct to participants, along with a debrief preparation questionnaire and an FAQs document to answer any immediate queries they may have. You then arrange separately for participants’ feedback sessions.
Users are also able to administer the tool themselves once accredited, to allow complete control of all aspects of the tool.
Yes. Strengthscope® has a team report component (StrengthscopeTeam™) which provides teams, team leaders and facilitators with very rich information about the extent to which a team is currently able to play to its strengths and where there may be opportunities and threats to the team playing fully to its strengths. A sample report is available on request.
We would be delighted to hear from you and will do our best to answer any and all questions you may have. Strengths Partnership can be contacted as follows:
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 (0)20 8944 0289
Copyright © 2015 Strengths Partnership
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any other information or retrieval system, without permission in writing from Strengths Partnership, 27-37 St Georges Road, Ground Floor, Tuition House, Wimbledon, SW19 4EU, tel: +44 (0) 20 8944 0289